Considering that I believe that: «And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.» Matthew 28:18-20
Considering that I believe that it is: Waited until Canada is founded on principles which recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of the law :
Considering that I believe that there exists in Canada : a Guarantee of the rights and freedoms and that the Canadian Charter of the rights and freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms which are stated there. They can be restricted only by one legal provision, within limits which are reasonable and whose justification can be shown within the framework of a free and democratic company.
Considering that I believe that: 2. Each one has following fundamental freedoms : a) freedom of conscience and religion ; b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including and other the mean of communication freedom of the press ; c) peaceful right to meet ; d) right of association.
Considering that I believe that we have also the Rights to the equality: and that by that 15. (1) the law does not make meaning of anybody and also applies to all, and all have right to the same protection and the same benefit of the law, independently of any discrimination, in particular of the discriminations based on the race, the national or ethnic origin, the color, the religion, the sex, the age or the deficiencies mental or physical.
(2) the paragraph (1) does not cause to prohibit the laws, programs or activities intended to improve the situation of individuals or disadvantaged groups, in particular because of their race, of their national or ethnic origin, their color, their religion, their sex, their age or their deficiencies mental or physical.
Considering that I believe that the PROVINCE of QUEBEC is still like forming part of the Canadian Constitution.
Considering that I believe
that: The Charter of the rights and freedoms
of the person affirms and protects the rights and freedoms of any person
living with Quebec. She has like major objective to harmonize the
reports/ratios of the citizens between them and with their institutions, in the
respect of human dignity.
Considering that I believe in: Preamble to the Charter poses the bases of
this harmonization, by in particular calling upon the mutual respect and the
reciprocity. The preamble to the Charter affirms that: Any human being has
rights and intrinsic freedoms intended to ensure its protection and its
blooming; all the being human are equal in value and dignity and have law to an
equal protection of the law; the respect of dignity human being and the
recognition of the rights and freedoms of which it is titular constitute the
base of justice and peace; the rights and freedoms of the human person are
inseparable from the rights and freedoms of others and the general wellbeing;
freedoms and basic rights of the person must be guaranteed by the collective
will and protected better from any violation.
Considering that I believe that I had, I have and I will always have freedoms and basic rights according to: Right to the life, safety, the integrity and the freedom of its person, as well as the recognition of the legal personality of each person [ article 1 ]; right to the help [ art. 2]; freedoms of conscience, religion, opinion, expression, peaceful meeting and association [ art. 3]; right to the safeguard of its dignity, its honour and its reputation [ art. 4]; right to the respect of its private life [ art. 5]; right to the peaceful pleasure and the free provision of its goods, except in the measurement envisaged by the law * [ art. 6]; right to the inviolability of its residence [ art. 7 and 8]; right to the respect of the professional secrecy [ art. 9].
Considering that I believe that I had, I have and I will always have: Legal guarantees 7. Each one has right to the life, the freedom and the safety of its person ; it can be carried reached with this right only in conformity with the principles of fundamental justice. 8. Each one has right to protection against the abusive excavations, searching or seizures. 9. Each one has right to protection against arbitrary detention or the imprisonment. 10. Each one has the right, in the event of arrest or of detention : a) to be as soon as possible informed reasons of its arrest or its detention ; b) to have recourse without delay to the assistance of a lawyer and to be informed of this right ; c) to make control, by habeas corpus, the legality of its detention and to obtain, if necessary, its release. 11. Very accused the right has : a) to be informed without delay abnormal of the precise infringement that one reproaches him ; b) to be judged within a reasonable time ; c) to be constrained to testify against itself in any continuation brought against him for the infringement only one reproaches him ; d) to be supposed innocent as long as it is not declared guilty, in accordance with the law, by a court independent and impartial at the end of public and equitable lawsuit ; E) not to be private without right cause of a setting in freedom together with a reasonable guarantee ; F) except if it acts of an infringement concerned with the military justice, to profit from a lawsuit with jury when the maximum sorrow planned for the infringement of which it is marked is a five years imprisonment or a more serious sorrow ; G) not to be declared guilty because of an action or an omission which, at the time when it occurred, did not constitute an infringement according to the national law of Canada or the international law and was not criminal according to the general principles of right recognized by the unit of the nations ; H) on the one hand not to be judged again for an infringement of which it was definitively discharged, on the other hand not to be judged nor punished again for an infringement of which it definitively was declared guilty and punished ; i) to profit from the least severe sorrow, when the sorrow which sanctions the infringement of which it is declared guilty is modified between the moment of the perpetration of the infringement and that of the sentence. 12. Each one has right to protection against all treatments or sorrows cruel and uncommon. 13. Each one has right so that no accusing testimony that it gives is used to accuse it in other procedures, except at the time of continuations for perjury or contradictory testimonies. 14. The part or the witness which cannot follow the procedures, either because they do not include/understand or do not speak the language employed, or because they are reached of deafness, has right to the assistance of an interpreter.
Considering that I believe that in Quebec: All are held to respect the rights and freedoms of the person. Insofar as the Charter recognizes that all the individuals are equal in value and dignity, all are thus held, in their social reports/ratios, to respect the rights and freedoms of others. Are also held to conform to the Charter: all groups and organizations; all private companies; all services, public or private; all governmental administrations (provincial, municipal, school...); the government of Quebec and its institutions, at all the levels of the hierarchy. In Quebec, nobody nor no organization of provincial competence can in fact of withdrawing itself from the Charter [ article 55 ].
Considering that I believe that: The only organizations which escape from the application from the Charter are, in fact, the institutions of federal competence like, for example, the federal public office, the banks, the companies of telecommunications, the services of air transport, railway or maritime... In these cases, it is the Canadian Law on the rights of the person who applies and it is the Canadian Commission of the rights of the person who can intervene.
For all these reasons: It is strongly recommended that all this history is stigmatized before the Superior Court of Canada Civil Chamber and Court of criminal appeal as soon as possible, in order to reinforce : The Canadian Charter of the rights and freedoms in MY COUNTRY CANADA like reinforcing: The Charter of the rights and freedoms of the person in MA PROVINCE of QUEBEC.
I recognizes that the KING of the kings & LORD of the lords always accompanied me throughout this long process, and that IT accompanies me at present, and that IT will accompany me until HIS RETURN.
I remember very
well to have arrived at the Hospital of Verdun on July 18, 1995 between laying
down it sun 20:38 and the twilight 21:14. To include/understand the state of
my arrival at the Hospital, it should be known that this day there I was
refused in five private clinics medical. However, I was very well dress and
very clean of my person in more of having in my possession my chart of
sickness insurance with my photograph. My parents called me it without
shelters of luxury, whereas my friends all were deafened vis-a-vis with all
this business.
Made note this
third page of this report/ratio numbered from 56 to 59 door pagination 58, one
sees there very well what is brought back by the Doctor J F Matthieu 04:40 and
05:30, it should be understood here that Doctor Matthieu took up duty as from
midnight on July 19 and that it was intended to take the changing of Doctor
Laurent Boisvert. I thank GOD OUR FATHER for having allowed that the contents
of this page are revealed after 70 months of waiting. I know by
experiment that it is very rare to see a Doctor cancelled the diagnosis of
another Doctor. I remember to have lived the same thing in the UNIVERSITY
HOSPITAL COMPLEX of SHERBROOKE in file CHUS
398 068 I remember to be attached in a bed 28 days after having celebrated
my 38e birthday of birth in the hospital or I was born either the HOSPITAL
COMPLEX from VERDUN. However with my arrived at the hospital on July 18 my
physical and/or mental and/or spiritual state did not require the application
at all.
I also remember
to have attended parents and friends of my exit of the CHUS is on April 12,
1995, and to be turned over to the
College of Sherbrooke
as
of my leave of day on April 11 Even if I had been wrongfully projected in
these places on February
8, 1995 like
a
second MARC LÉPINE in becoming for QUEBEC and Accused
- Condemned - Maltreated Without Laws Nor Laws Persecuted -
Tortured - Stolen. I
remember there
to be gone back to make my final examinations of 1st at May 9, 1995 for
obtaining my collegial diploma of study in Animal Health that
professors stole me.
All
will testify that throughout my life, I never suffered from paranoid psychosis
and/or of paranoid psychosis acute and/or of is delirious. Especially for the
period of April 12 at July 18, 1995.
I remember at
the time of my training in Animal Health with the College of Sherbrooke all
the importance which one attached to the Canadian Council protection animals
(CCPA) and his hot lines: revision of protocols of use of animals of
experimentation of the CCPA, 1997
THE
PHYSICAL CONSTRAINT
The physical
constraint, i.e. a short-term constraint using manual or mechanical equipment
(cages of immobilization), is often necessary to be able to examine the
animals, to collect samples, and to supplement other clinical and experimental
handling. The stress resulting from applications can be minimized by a
conditioning of the animal; by the use of adapted equipment, of suitable size
and design; and by a correct use of the equipment by qualified personnel. A physical
application during more than a few minutes should be practised on a conscious
animal only if no valid alternative method exists. Measures must be taken with
an aim of conditioning the animals with the equipment of application, in order
to minimize the stress and discomfort at the time of the experimental
procedures. If the application is necessary, the used equipment should be
designed so as to make it possible the animal to as naturally change position
as possible, and the period of application should be as short as possible. The
maintenance of not-human primates in chairs of application should be avoided.
The duration of
the application should depend on factors such as the species, the health and
the age of the animal, just as the level of application. A level of
application which prevents the movement of certain groups of muscles requires
a constant monitoring and should be of rather short duration in order to avoid
painful muscular cramps. An application which allows a free movement of all
the muscles, but which limits displacements and the other activities which
require movements of the whole body, should be stopped regularly by periods of
exercise. One duration and an acceptable level of application should be
established at the time of a pilot study under monitoring veterinary surgeon,
if these parameters were not already defined. The animals under application
must be followed by qualified personnel.
Declaration of Lisbon
of World Medical Association on the Patient's rights Adopted by the
34e World Medical Parliament PREAMBULE The relation
doctor-patient-company has lately known of the important changes. If the
doctor must continue to act according to his conscience and in the best
interest of the patient, it will have to also make its possible to guarantee
autonomy and justice with the patient. The following declaration presents some
of the rights of principles of the patient whom the medical profession
approves and supports. The doctors and other people or organizations concerned
with the service of the care of health have the joint responsibility to
recognize and defend these rights. When a legislation, a governmental
measurement, an administration or an institution deprive the patients of these
rights, the doctors must seek the suitable means to guarantee them or to
recover them. Within the
framework of biomedical research relating to human people - including
non therapeutic biomedical research - the subject can claim with the same
rights and the same attention as a patient in a normal therapeutic situation. PRINCIPLES 1. Right to
medical care of quality has.
Any person has the right to receive, without any
discrimination, of the suitable medical care. 2. Right to
freedom of choice
has.
The patient has the right to choose and change
freely doctor, hospital or establishment of care of health, without being
concerned with know if they belong to the public sector or the private sector. 3. Right of
decision
has.
The patient has the right to make decisions
freely relating to it. The doctor will inform it of the consequences of his
decisions. 4. The
unconscious patient
has.
If the patient is unconscious or unable to
express his will, the legal representative must, when it can it and when the
law allows it to make known its enlightened assent. 5. The patient
legally unable
has.
If the patient did not reach the age of the
majority yet or if it is legally unable, it is necessary to have, when the law
allows it, the assent of the legal representative. Nevertheless, the patient
will have, as far as possible, to take share with the decisions. 6.
Use of contrary methods to the will of the patient The methods of
diagnosis or contrary treatment the will of the patient can be employed only
in exceptional circumstances, if they are expressly authorized by the law and
if they are in conformity with the principles of medical ethics.
7. Right to
information has.
The patient has the right to receive the
information relating to it contained in the medical file and to be fully
informed on his health, including medical data reporting itself in his state.
However, confidential information concerning a third will not be revealed
without the assent of this last. 8. Right to the
professional secrecy has.
Any identifiable information concerning the
health, the medical circumstances, the diagnosis, the forecast, the treatment
of the patient and any other information relating to it into clean, must
remain confidential, even after its death. Exceptionally, the descendants can
have a right of access to information likely to reveal the risks which they
incur for their health. 9. Right to
information on education of health Any person has
right to a medical education allowing him to make a decision informed on her
health and the health services available. This teaching will have in
particular to bring information on the various healthy ways of life and on the
means of prevention and early detection of the diseases. The responsibility
for each one towards its health will have also to be underlined. The doctors
have the obligation to take share with the educational actions. 10. Right to
dignity
has.
The dignity and the right to the private life of
the patient, as regards care like teaching, constantly will be respected. 11. Right to
the religious assistance
The patient has
the right to receive or refuse a spiritual and moral help, including that of a
minister representing the religion of his choice.
Lisbon (Portugal), September/October 1981
and
amended by the 47e General meeting
Bali (Indonesia), September 1995
B. The patient has the right to be
treated by a doctor of which it knows that it can make a clinical and ethical
assessment without external pressure.
C. The patient will be always treated in
the respect of his best interest. The application of the treatment will be in
conformity with the generally approved medical principles.
D. The guarantee of quality must always
form integral part of the care of health. The doctors, in particular, should
agree the responsibility to be the agents of this quality.
E. When the circumstances require to
select potential patients for a treatment whose service is limited, these
patients have right so that the procedure of selection used be regular. This
choice must be done on the basis of medical criteria and without
discrimination.
F. The patient has right to a follow-up
of the care. The doctor has the obligation to cooperate with the coordination
of the medical regulations with the other providers of health treating the
patient. Doctor must not to stop treatment of patient, as long as there is a
medical regulation which requires to continue it, without him to give the
necessary assistance and information which enables him to consider other care.
B. The patient has the right to ask for
constantly the opinion of another doctor.
B. Any qualified adult has the right to
give or refuse to give his assent to a diagnostic or therapeutic method. He
has right to information necessary to make his decisions. He must clearly be
able to include/understand the object of an examination or a treatment, the
effects of their results and the consequences of a refusal of assent.
C. The patient has the right to refuse to
take part in research or the teaching of medicine.
B. If in the absence of the legal
representative, it required urgent medical intervention there, the assent of
the patient will be supposed, unless on the basis of preliminary declaration
or conviction firm, it is not obvious and undeniable only it would have, in
similar case, refused the intervention.
C. However, the doctors must always try
to save the life of the unconscious patient following a suicide attempt.
B. When the patient legally unable can
make rational decisions, those must be respected, and it has the right to
prevent the revelation of information to its legal representative.
C. When the legal representative or the
person authorized by the patient refuses a treatment which, of the opinion of
the doctor, proves to be in the best interest of the patient, the doctor
should dispute this decision before a legal or different institution suitable.
In the event of urgency, the doctor will act in better interest for the
patient.
B. Exceptionally, information could not
be communicated to the patient when there are good reasons to believe that it
constitutes a danger to its life or its health.
C. Information must be given so as to
respect the local culture and with being included/understood by the patient.
D. The patient has, on his request
express, the right not to be informed, unless the protection of the life of
another person does not require it.
E. The patient has, if necessary, the
right to choose the person who will have to be informed on her subject.
B. Confidential information can be
revealed only in the condition express that the patient gives the assent of it
or that provided that the law authorizes it expressly. It cannot be revealed
with the other providers of health that on the basis of need "to
know" unless it patient its explicit assent does not give any.
C. All the identifiable data concerning
the patient must be protected. This protection must correspond to their form
of storage. The human substances from which these data are identifiable must
be also protected.
B. The patient has right so that the mode
of appeasing of its sufferings is in conformity with the current state of
knowledge.
C. The patient in final phase has the
right to be treated with humanity and to receive all help available so that
its death is as worthy and comfortable as possible.
